In early 1991, an expert group, with a membership drawn from fourteen
countries and four international
organisations, was formed to examine the economics of the fuel cycle
with particular reference to a power
station comprising a pressurised water reactor (PWR) commissioning in
the year 2000. The expert group
finalised its report at the end of 1993. The task of the expert group
was to update the OECD/NEA 1983/84 study which was published in 1985.
That study defined the levelised lifetime fuel cycle cost using internationally
accepted investment appraisal methodology. Costs were derived for fuel
cycles based on reprocessing and on long-term spent fuel storage followed
by direct disposal. The current study repeats that approach. Use of
a 5 per cent reference case discount rate is still considered appropriate
in reflecting the consensus of national practices. It also enables direct
comparison to be made with previous results. Variations due to the use
of different discount rates are also given.
|
Executive Summary 2. Methodology and common assumptions
3. The nuclear fuel cycle
4.The costs of the PWR fuel cycle stages 4.1 The front-end of the fuel cycle
5.The calculation of total fuel costs for PWR
6.Sensitivity analyses for PWR fuel costs
7.Comparison between the results of the present
study and
9. Conclusions 10. References ANNEXES
|
Download full publication
in Acrobat PDF (1.7 mb)
The french version is available in PDF
This publication is out of print and can only be obtained from this
website.
Executive Summary
1. Introduction
2. Methodology and common assumptions
3. The nuclear fuel cycle
4.The costs of the PWR fuel cycle stages
4.1 The front-end of the fuel cycle
5.The calculation of total fuel costs for PWR
6.Sensitivity analyses for PWR fuel costs
7.Comparison between the results of the present
study and
the 1985 study
9. Conclusions
10. References